Jose Sandoval Google
 Resume     Book     Software     Drawings     Home Search Web Search josesandoval.com
Mona Lisa
The most expensive and the most famous poplar piece of wood in the history of our civilazation: Leonardo Da Vinci's Mona Lisa.

This is my version of the original (click on the image to enlarge):



Larger version.

There is already too much said and written about the Mona Lisa. All I will say is that the "smile" is very hard draw, as it is not really a smile: it's the shadow cast from the sitter's lips, and it appears to be different from different angles because it is a visual illusion--if you look at it directly, it is gone; if you let your peripheral vision see it, you catch a glimpse of the mystic smile that inspired many artists and inspired my drawing.

If you look closer at my drawing, you'll notice that it has a certain resemblance to the Mona Lisa; however, it is not an exact rendition of her. This is due to the lack of drawing skills on my part.

The Process
I wanted to see the progress of the drawing throughout the process. Perhaps there is something to be learnt.

The following series of pictures shows the transformation of a blank piece of paper (18" x 24" newsprint) into a complete drawing:




I had to get the basic shape and the proportions of the drawing. For that I use willow charcoal:




Once the basic shape is in place, I started adding some values to the face (using regular charcoal). It's hard to decide where to start, so I decided to start at the darkest side of the face:




I continued adding some of the details of the face, such as the eyes, the nose, and the complete outline of the face:




The face looked weird without the mouth, so the next logical step is the mouth. At this point, I had already fixed the size of the nose as it was too long. Note the smile coming through:




Not a lot changed here. I did change the size of the face a bit and kept working on the mouth. Note the size of the neck. It's too thick; something that I fixed in the next step:




At this point, I already had enough of the face and I had to tackle the hair. If you noticed the previous drawings, they had no hair. I was putting it off until last, because I don't know how to draw hair.

Also, I hadn't decided if I wanted to draw the dress. I stopped thinking about it (shutting off my logical side) and decided to give it a shot. The dress was another challenge in itself as the whole thing is covered by a thin transparent looking fabric--similar to the vale. It's really hard to see, but, I guess that's why they call it sfumato:




This next image, doesn't look different from the last - However, there is a big change: the smile - I had to fix it, as it looked too "hard." I had to soften the edges a bit - I think it may have worked:



Random thoughts
Since my drawing is an approximation of the original, I started thinking about pi - For some purposes 3 is good enough of an approximation. For others, 3.1415 is good enough.

If you allow me an analogy, I think of my drawing is more of 3, rather than the true value of pi, which doesn't have a specific real number. So, the Mona Lisa, in my mind, is like pi: irrational and forever infinite. I think this analogy would work, even for a very talented artist. I.e., The more his or her drawing/painting resembles the the original painting, the more digits pi would have.

Conspiracy theory
During my research, I found this particular writer Rizah Kulenovic, who argues that the Mona Lisa is actually a portrait of Leonardo's mother. At the conclusion of his essay, he writes:
    Would Lionardo pay so much attention to a painting of a shopkeeper's mistress during the last years of his life? This sounds absurd, both from human and physcological aspects.
I have never heard this argument before, and it sounds quite logical to me. However, I'm always up for a good conspiracy theory, and this doesn't sound too irrational.

Guestbook
© Jose Sandoval 2004-2009 jose@josesandoval.com